Ζολώτα ακόλουθοι

Ο Ξενοφών Ζολώτας ως πρέσβης της της ελληνικής γλώσσας εκφώνησε ενώπιον  του ΔΝΤ ένα λόγο στα ελληνικά χρησιμοποιώντας την αγγλική, προκαλώντας  παγκόσμια αίσθηση.  Ως αντιπρόσωπος της Ελλάδας,   από τον απροσδόκητο λόγο του στις 26 Σεπτεμβρίου 1957, ενώπιον   του Διεθνούς Νομισματικού Ταμείου, σε μία από τις πιο ουσιαστικές   του ενέργειες για την προβολή της ελληνικής γλώσσας. Ο εκλιπών,   μίλησε ελληνικά και τον κατάλαβαν όλοι γιατί χρησιμοποίησε ατόφια   την αγγλική γλώσσα! Επακολούθησε ανυπόκριτος ενθουσιασμός και   χειροκροτήματα από όρθιους τους συνέδρους. Την επομένη είχαν   πρωτοσέλιδο το λόγο του οι "New York Times" και η "Washington   Post", περνώντας σε όλο τον κόσμο το μήνυμα, ότι η ελληνική   γλώσσα μπορεί να χρησιμοποιηθεί και να λειτουργήσει σε όλες τις   ευρωπαϊκές γλώσσες. 

"Kyrie, I eulogize the archons of the Panethnic Numismatic Thesaurus and the Ecumenical Trapeza for the orthodoxy of their axioms, methods and policies, although there is an episode of cacophony of the Trapeza with Hellas. With enthusiasm we dialogue and synagonize at the synods of our didymous organizations in which polymorphous economic ideas and dogmas are analyzed and synthesized. Our critical problems such as the numismatic plethora generate some agony and melancholy. This phenomenon is characteristic of our epoch. But, to my thesis, we have the dynamism to program therapeutic practices as a prophylaxis from chaos and catastrophe. In parallel, a Panethnic unhypocritical economic synergy and harmonization in a democratic climate is basic. I apologize for my eccentric monologue. I emphasize my euharistia to you, Kyrie to the eugenic arid generous American Ethnos and to the organizes and protagonists of his Amphictyony and the gastronomic symposia". 

Το 1998 ο ελληνικής καταγωγής καθηγητής Γιάννης Καλαράς έκανε κάτι αντίστοιχο, θέλοντας να δείξει τη σπουδαιότητα και την καθοριστική επίδραση της ελληνικής γλώσσας στο δυτικό πολιτισμό.

"Economic systems basically  symbolize the philosophy and the ideology of their party. In a democratic political system, ideology and dialogue  characterize the basic methodology and strategy of the politicians. However, systems like monarchy tyrany, or oligarchy, are stigmatized with megaeconomic and  social problems. When monarchs or tyrants were dethroned, they nostalgically  agonized how to bring anarchy, so that they may be enthroned again. Their chronic egomania and megalomania, their apathy for philanthropy and their  aenigmatic, problematic and pathetic logic, periodically stigmatized the political  arena. Tyrants symbolize anarchy, phobia, panic, chronic epidemy and paralysis  of the socioeconomic system.

The agora was the physical location  where politicians, philosophers and scholars would analyze the problems generated by monarchy, tyranny and periodically aristocracy.

The basic methodology was dialogue,  rhetoric or poetry. The dialogue was characterized by synthesis analysis, and synopsis, a systematic  phenomenon in every epistimologist’s phraseology.

The rhetoric was pragmatic, yet  charesmatic, characterized by harmony, magnetic fantasy and practical talent. Historians and chronographers  have systematically shown that charesmatic politicians electrified the odium  or the agora with their rhetoric, in which they used cosmetic epithets,  eclectic idioms, metaphors, paradigms and paradoxical phraseological  idiosyncrasies.

Classical poets, satyrs, scholars  and philosophers emphatically critisized the anemic tyrants for their catastrophic and scandaleous egomania. Paradoxically, inspite their idiosyncracies, some tyrants, like  Periandros the Corinthian, were charesmatic, philanthropic and sympathetic

to the economic problems and social  climate. Some of them, who strategized their economics ethically and logically, created economic euphoria,  which allowed architects to build odiums and theaters to practice music and  drama, gymnasiums and stadiums to organize athletisism. Most of them, however,  had the syndrome of apathy, autocracy, autarchy, empathy, were myopic and  spasmodic egomaniacs, who antagonized everything that demonstrated an antithesis.

However, the climax of ideology,  dialogue, epistimology, philosophy, logic and harmony, are practiced in a democratic system. Here you have the  forum at the agora, where politics and socioeconomics are analyzed by  politicians, academicians and scholars. Politicians antagonized the philosophers and  scholars on ideology and practicality of economic systems and ideas. They both,  however, emphasized ethicacy, ideology, logic and harmonious political  atmosphere.

History has no parallel paradigm of  a politician with character and charisma, like Pericles the Athenian, whose scholastic and stochastic dynamism,  rhetoric, fantasy, energy and ideology characterized him as the ARCHITECT OF THE  ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY.

Νομίζω ότι είναι ελληνικά και μόνο ελληνικά. Εσείς τι λέτε;